Mediation and social performance
Companies call me when a social license is coming apart or land access has been stalled for eighteen months. Communities call me when they are being asked to negotiate their future against a team that has been preparing for years. I work in the room where the tension is real and the margin for error is zero.
Pit rims and village halls. Same method, different room.
Trusted by and affiliated with
Your community strategy is your most expensive blind spot
Research conducted from IFC and World Bank data puts the cost of community conflict at 50 to 70 percent of a project’s net present value. On a project valued at 341 million dollars, that is more than 200 million lost. Not to geology. Not to engineering. To broken relationships.
Standard consultation fails because it treats engagement as a compliance exercise. The cost of having no real process is always higher than the cost of building one.
The live instrument
Updated 27 July 2026 · refreshed every Monday
What the friction is about
Compiled from public reporting. A high count means several sources are reporting friction, not that a company has done something wrong.
The map is one of four free instruments on this site, built from the same frameworks I use on mandate. Three diagnostics sit next to it, and each one will tell you within ten minutes which part of your process is going to fail first.
The method
The relationship between a project and the people living on top of it is infrastructure. It bears load, it decays without maintenance, and, the part almost nobody acts on, it can be deliberately built. Social Accord Architecture is the discipline I built to do that, and it runs across the whole project lifecycle rather than arriving with the first protest.
It came out of practice, not a seminar. Two thousand grievance claims in Mozambique, land access negotiations on a lithium project in Portugal, and fifteen years of mandates where the relationship between a company and a community decided whether the project moved.
The constitution of the discipline. Architecture over improvisation, dual accountability, lifecycle integration, trauma awareness, professional distinction. Each one is a scar with a rule attached.
Diagnostic mapping, blueprinting, assembly, then stewardship across the decades a project runs. Pre-feasibility to closure, not first protest to settlement.
GROUNDS for a standard dispute, REBUILD when real harm sits in the room, and a scored instrument to decide which one a dispute needs before anybody sits down. The contingency inside the architecture, not the whole of it.
Core services
When the dispute is already live
Impartial facilitation between an operator and the communities around it. Land access, compensation, environmental grievances, benefit agreements, and the disputes that have already reached the road or the courts.
Before it becomes a dispute
Engagement design for companies: consultation that holds up, grievance mechanisms people use, early warning that reaches decision-makers in time. Negotiation support for communities: the leverage, the mandate, and what the agreement on the table will mean in ten years.
When your team carries it
Field-tested mediation and negotiation training for community relations teams, social performance functions, and the mediators who want to specialize in this sector.
Thomas played a crucial role in ensuring agreement was reached during discussions between MRM and community leaders and representatives. Since these discreet engagements, Thomas has been retained by Gemfields on an ongoing basis to provide mediation advice, support and training. Thomas has proven to be a skilled mediator and trainer.
The library
Each volume writes the same discipline for a different side of the table: the mediator, the practitioner absorbing the pressure, the community negotiating its future, and the board that signs off.
The library keeps growing. The next volumes are in production, and the shelf has room.
A serious game
A business game in the sense a business school means it, built for what happens between a project and the people living next to it. Half the room runs a contested lithium project. The other half lives beside it. Both face the same five crises, neither can see the other’s reasoning, and every world ends somewhere different.
You can tell a room that one side holds the money, the information and the clock. Nobody disagrees, and nothing changes on Monday. Hand someone the weaker chair for a morning and it changes.
Up to 56 players
Four worlds, two tables to a world, seven characters to a table. It scales down to one table, and to one person.
Four rooms
Solo online, university and executive cohorts, conference programs, and inside a company.
A different game
One person, one evening, no facilitator. Its own project, its own cast of six: the community relations manager, the mediator, the community leader, the chief executive, the ESG lawyer and the grievance consultant, all in one shared world. You pick a chair and live with what you decide from it.
It is not a smaller version of the Accord Game. It is the other one, and it is free, in English and French.
Free, about thirty minutes, and your progress saves in your own browser.
From the field
Who does this work
I have mediated more than 2,000 community and historic claims across Sub-Saharan Africa, negotiated land access for a lithium operation in Portugal, and spent fifteen years resolving the conflicts in this industry that generalists cannot reach.
I co-founded the ICFML, the certification body for Portuguese-speaking mediators, and I teach negotiation and mediation at the Universidade Católica Portuguesa. I am admitted to the New York Bar and hold an LL.M. in Alternative Dispute Resolution and an MBA in Mining and Raw Materials. The credentials matter less than the mandates. The work is hands-on, confidential and ongoing.
Thomas demonstrates an incredible capacity of active listening and always finds new topics to learn and share; he has a continuous curiosity about the world and a true commitment and care for people that work with him.
Thomas is a multi-skilled, energetic and well qualified Dispute Resolution practitioner who is dedicated to building the commitment of Portuguese lawyers to non-adjudicative Dispute Resolution. He is a pioneer in his field and a privilege to work with.
A 30-minute call is enough for me to understand the situation and tell you honestly whether I can help. Active opposition, a social license problem, an FPIC process that needs an independent facilitator, a negotiation a community has to prepare for, or a conflict that is not public yet but will be. It makes no difference which side of the table you are on. No obligation, no generalist pitch.
Every first conversation is confidential.
